Reports

Every screened site report, its findings, and the decision taken

corpus
7 documents
searchable
73 chunks
← all reports
escalation #2dismissed
screened
9 Sept 2026, 16:08
findings
3 (2 high, 1 medium)
searches
3
record
escalation #2

Findings

issueseveritygoverning rulerecommended action
Guardrail removed from the east run of the level-4 scaffold platform (approx. 12 m open edge) and not reinstalled. Crew continued working from the platform throughout the shift with no fall protection in place. The scaffold is erected to 8 m, well above the 10 ft (3.1 m) trigger height.high[OSHA 3150 Scaffold Guide, Sec E, p.42] §1926.451(g)(1) — Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level shall be protected from falling to that lower level; and [OSHA 3150 Scaffold Guide, p.8] §1926.451(g)(4) — Guardrails shall be installed along all open sides and ends before releasing the scaffold for use by employees.Stop work on the level-4 east-run platform immediately. Reinstall the full guardrail system (toprail and midrail) along the entire 12 m open edge before any employee is permitted back on that platform. Until the guardrail is restored, provide and enforce use of a personal fall arrest system for any essential access. A competent person must inspect and sign off the guardrail before resuming normal operations.
Crew worked from the level-4 scaffold platform for the full shift with a 12 m open edge and no guardrail reinstated, constituting ongoing unprotected exposure to a fall hazard at approximately 8 m elevation — with no alternative fall protection (e.g. personal fall arrest system) reported as being provided.high[OSHA 3150 Scaffold Guide, Sec E, p.42] §1926.451(g)(1) and (g)(1)(vii) — Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level shall be protected by use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of §1926.451(g)(4).Immediately implement a written procedure requiring that any time a guardrail is removed for material handling, the scaffold platform is taken out of service for general crew use, and any remaining access requires mandatory use of a personal fall arrest system attached to an independent anchor point. Conduct a site-wide safety briefing reinforcing this requirement before next shift.
Two labourers observed on the scaffold without hard hats during the afternoon concrete pour, in violation of the mandatory head protection requirement for scaffold workers.medium[OSHA 3150 Scaffold Guide, Sec E, p.43] §1926.451(h)(1) — In addition to wearing hardhats, each employee on a scaffold shall be provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects.Remove from the scaffold and do not permit return of any employee not wearing a hard hat. Issue and enforce a site-wide mandatory PPE directive confirming that hard hats are required at all times on scaffold platforms. Document the names of the two labourers observed in non-compliance, issue formal warnings, and conduct a PPE toolbox talk before the next shift.

Search log

  1. searchedhard hat head protection requirement construction site6 results · 2192 ms
  2. searchedscaffold guardrail open edge fall protection6 results · 2209 ms
  3. searchedworking on open edge platform fall hazard6 results · 2537 ms
  4. drafted3 findingsescalation #2 saved as draft · 1169 ms

Report as submitted

Daily Site Report - Tower B, 14 Mar. Crew of 9 on levels 3-5. Formwork stripped on level 4. Scaffold erected on the north face to 8m. The guardrail on the east run of the level-4 platform was removed yesterday to move materials and has not been reinstalled; the open edge is roughly 12m long. Crew continued working from that platform all shift. Two labourers were observed on the scaffold without hard hats during the afternoon pour. Concrete pour on level 3 completed at 15:40. Weather dry. Delivery of rebar arrived 11:00, offloaded by crane without incident.

Decision

Dismissed — human decision
decided by
not recorded
decided at
not recorded
drafted
9 Sept 2026, 16:08
status
dismissed

this decision predates the identity layer — status was recorded, the person and the moment were not